Tag Archives: political parties

Millennials Move Toward Party Independence Offers Hope

I’ve half-joked for years that Washington D.C. has too many Democrats, too many Republicans and far too few Americans. It’s not that our leaders aren’t patriotic. Instead, strong party identification itself is more hazardous to national governance than most suspect.

In Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason and the Gap Between Us and Them, Harvard Professor Joshua Greene delves into the problems created by tribally influenced public policy decisions. Throughout history, our moral intuitions are heavily influenced by human desire to remain in solidarity with our identified tribe (or political party). Human instincts frequently align with protecting the tribe rather than solving the problem. We’ve certainly seen this behavior in Washington expand exponentially since the early 1990s.

To make matters worse, even when political leaders engage what Greene refers to as their “manual mode” to more deeply reflect on ideal solutions, they are increasingly disoriented by the selective information sources that shape their views. Few elected officials have the time or political incentive to do what should be their most important work of studying why they might be wrong and whether alternative solutions exist outside of mainstream party policy.

There may be reason for hope. Recent Pew Research Center polling data shows that half of all Millennials now consider themselves political independents. This is the largest and fastest-growing generational party independence. If Americans move away from strong party identification toward issue-by-issue and person-by-person judgment of our elected leaders, we may be able to nudge our political leaders toward less tribal approaches. Of course, we will also need to enact political reforms, such as California’s recent move toward open primaries, to make it more likely that politicians who stray from their tribe on an issue can survive politically.

Recent Trends in Party Identification, by Generation

In his farewell address in 1796, President George Washington warned about the troubles political parties would create for our nation: “They are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”
Perhaps our Millennial generation has already seen enough of this behavior, from both parties, to decide it’s time to chart a new course.

Is Being a “Paid Liar” Identical to Being Partisan?

When House Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa calls White House spokesman Jay Carney a “paid liar,” is he really just saying that Carney is a committed Democrat. Political science research has shown for decades that political partisans see the world through highly shaded lenses, and can’t even agree on basic facts, as a recent Washington Post blog article noted.

A 1988 American National Election Studies survey showed that more than 50 percent of people who identified themselves as strong Democrats believed inflation had become somewhat or substantially worse during President Reagan’s tenure. In fact, inflation fell from 13.5 percent to 4.1 percent under Reagan’s leadership. Princeton Professor Larry Bartels noted that, “Democrats were strikingly impervious to the good economic news” in his review of that study. Republicans don’t handle facts any better. Brendan Nyhan of Dartmouth and Jason Reifler of Georgia State found that Republicans presented with news articles pointing out that there were no WMDs in Iraq were more likely to say that such weapons were found than Republicans who didn’t read those articles. The truth, in other words, triggered a partisan backlash of their view of the facts, as the Post story noted.

It gets worse. Continue reading